Skip to content

Regulatory compliance

Reference build

Fourteen jurisdictions watched, no deadline missed

An agent that monitors regulator websites across fourteen jurisdictions, extracts deadlines from the current source text rather than hardcoded rules, and escalates until a human confirms.

0missed filing deadlines

At a glance

Duration
17 weeks
Team size
1 person
Engagement
New build
Project type
AI & automation
Industry
Fintech

The situation

The challenge

Regulatory requirements change unpredictably and with little notice. The prior approach was a compliance team member checking websites by hand — which works right up until the week it does not, and the consequences of that week are legal and financial.

What we did

Monitor continuously, extract deadlines from the live source rather than a rules file, and design the whole thing to never go quiet.

The calls that mattered

  • Deadlines read from the source, not a rules table

    Extraction from current regulatory text, so a changed deadline is picked up rather than silently contradicted by a hardcoded rule someone wrote last year.

  • Never silent, rather than always right

    An escalating alert cadence as a deadline approaches, and drafted checklists that a human confirms before submission. The agent's job is to make sure nothing falls through, not to make the final call.

What changed

missed filing deadlines
0missed filing deadlines
less checklist preparation time
65%less checklist preparation time
jurisdictions monitored
14jurisdictions monitored
to flag a relevant regulation change
<24hto flag a relevant regulation change
  • 0 — since launch
  • 65% — per filing

No missed deadlines since launch across fourteen jurisdictions, relevant changes flagged inside 24 hours, and 65% less time preparing each filing checklist.

Services used

  • Scheduled regulator monitoring with relevance filtering
  • Deadline extraction from live regulatory text
  • Escalating alert cadence and drafted filing checklists

What we would do differently

Every project has one of these. Publishing it is the point — a case study with no regrets in it is marketing, not evidence.

For compliance-adjacent systems, designing for 'never silent' rather than 'always right' is the correct objective. Humans keep decision authority; the system's obligation is that nothing reaches a deadline unseen.